$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 57/2022, CM APPL. 8867/2022 (stay) KAMAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. U. K. Shandilya, Advocate. versus RAMESH KUMAR SAINI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vijay Yadav and Ms. Sushma Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 09.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties, which is endorsed by the learned counsel for the Respondent. 2. In view of the submissions made, learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission for withdrawal of the Appeal. 3. It is further submitted that there is no objection to release of the deposited amount in favour of the Respondent. 4. The amount be accordingly released on moving of appropriate Application before the learned Registrar by the Respondent. 5. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly. The pending Application also stands disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. JULY 09, 2026/RS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:45:17