CRM-M-35406 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (158) HARVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120 subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 33 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, including the charge compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P parties. 2. Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and 35406-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HARVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Labh Singh. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120 subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 33 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, including the charge-sheet (Annexures P-2 and P compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35406-2026 Date of Decision:- 06.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120-B of the IPC added subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 333 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, 2 and P-3), on the basis of the compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) arrived at between the Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and 06.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 B of the IPC added 3 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, 3), on the basis of the 4) arrived at between the Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and MANJU 2026.07.08 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-35406 filed power 3. the present petition is based on a partial compromise. 4 identical issue is pending bef prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage. 5. respondents No.2 and 3 be bound The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3. 6. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. July 06, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 35406-2026 -2- filed power of attorney, which is taken on record. At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the present petition is based on a partial compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an identical issue is pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage. Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays that respondents No.2 and 3 be bound down not to resile from the compromise. The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. July 06, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No of attorney, which is taken on record. At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the present petition is based on a partial compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an ore the Hon'ble Apex Court. She, however, prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays that down not to resile from the compromise. The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as ade clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an , however, prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays that down not to resile from the compromise. The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as ade clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the MANJU 2026.07.08 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document