IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 RSA-647-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 Sudesh Mahajan and others ...Appellants Versus Satish Kumar Mahajan and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have filed a suit for partition, wherein a statement in the affirmative has been made that they would withdraw all pending litigation initiated by them qua the suit property in the said suit. Learned counsel for the appellants further states that appellant No.3, namely Ms. Heena Mahajan, is present in Court and has also reiterated the instructions received by him from all the appellants. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has no objection to the same. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIKAS SURI ) July 07, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.07.08 12:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment