HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR AT HISSAR v. JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR
CR/2669/2022 · 2026-05-26
Harkesh Manuja
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2837 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2837 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR No.2669 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 135
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR
Vs Vs Vs Vs JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate and
Mr. Sahil Mehndiratta, Advocate
for respondent No.1. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. By orders dated 16.03.2018/17.03.2018 (Annexure P Additional District Judge respondent was held entitled to the enhanced c [2]. Despite repeated pass overs, no one has chosen to appear on behalf of the petitioner. [3]. In such circumstances, the present prosecution. [4]. Pending application(s), if any shall also
May 26 May 26 May 26 May 26, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision:
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR
JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR JAGDISH SINGH AND ANR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ None for the petitioner. Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Sahil Mehndiratta, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryana.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present revision petition, 16.03.2018/17.03.2018 (Annexure P Additional District Judge Sirsa-cum-Reference Court, whereby the respondent was held entitled to the enhanced compensation being co Despite repeated pass overs, no one has chosen to appear on behalf of In such circumstances, the present Pending application(s), if any shall also
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) CR No.2669 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision:26.05 26.05 26.05 26.05.202 .202 .202 .2026666
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN THROUGH ITS ...... ...... ...... ...... Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondentssss HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJAAAA Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryana. revision petition, challenge has been laid to the 16.03.2018/17.03.2018 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Reference Court, whereby the private ompensation being co-sharer. Despite repeated pass overs, no one has chosen to appear on behalf of In such circumstances, the present petition is dismissed for non Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1
challenge has been laid to the passed by the learned private Despite repeated pass overs, no one has chosen to appear on behalf of non- MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.27 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment