Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2835 (BOM)

ARUN VISHNUPANT BHAGYAWANT v. PARWATIBAI UTTAM WAKADE AND OTHERS

CP/59/2022 · 2026-07-31

Shri Abhay J Mantri

Contempt Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

916.CP.251.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2008 Arun Vishnupand Bhagyanwant ...Petitioner Versus Aananda Uttam Wakade and Others ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13358 OF 2023 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5084 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8771 OF 2023 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2245 OF 2024 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2022 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 580 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2008 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2008 *** Mr. Joshi Rahul G., (Through V.C.) Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh W. Munde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 9. Mr. Shivraj B. Kadu, Advocate for Respondent No.7. Mr. S. G. Sangle, Addl. GP for Respondent – State. Mr. Kapil D. Paikrao h/f Mr. A. M. Salok, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in CP/59/2022, CA/8771/2023, CA/13350/2023 and CA/16291/2022; Shrikant Malani 916.CP.251.2022.odt Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in CP/580/2025. Mr. Vijay R. Autade, Advocate for Respondent No.14. *** CORAM: ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : JULY 31, 2026 PER COURT : CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2022 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the Petitioner does not want to proceed against Respondent Nos.8 and 10 to 15 in Contempt Petition No.251 of 2022. His statement is accepted. 2. In view of the above statement, the Petition is dismissed against Respondent Nos.8 and 10 to 15. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 580 OF 2022 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the Petitioner does not want to proceed against Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in Contempt Petition No.580 of 2022. His statement is accepted. 4. In view of the above statement, the Petition is dismissed against Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2022 5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to delete the names of Respondent Nos.3 and 4 by 04th August 2026, failing which, the Shrikant Malani 916.CP.251.2022.odt Contempt Petition No.59 of 2022 shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 6. List all these matters on 05th August 2026. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shrikant Malani