125-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1211 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Sumer Singh and others .......... Petitioners Versus Sh. Devinder Singh, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Haryana, Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran Haryana Civil Secretariat, Sector-1, Chandigarh and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Komal Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No. 1. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4-HSVP. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-3316-CII-2024 Prayer in the present application moved on behalf of the applicants-petitioners, is for bringing on record the legal representatives of petitioner No. 4-Sher Singh, who died on 03.12.2023 and further exemption from filing the certified / true typed copy of death certificate enclosed as Annexure A-1. Notice of the application. Learned counsel(s) for the respondent(s) accept notice and raise no objection against the prayer made in the application. DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.27 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No. 1211 of 2022 (O&M) [2] In view of the above as well as contents of the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The persons mentioned in para-2 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of petitioner No. 4-Sher Singh so as to pursue the present contempt petition. MAIN CASE Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in terms of Collector’s Award, the compensation has been paid to the petitioners, however, seeks permission to raise their grievance with respect to the market value or any other cause regarding the compensation as against the structures or trees etc. before the learned Reference Court in terms of Section 64 of The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. [2] Learned counsel(s) for the respondent(s) raise no objection against the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. [3] In view of the above, no orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off with the liberty as prayed by the petitioners. [4] Rule stands discharged. [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. May 26, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.27 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document