Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2816 (PNJ)

VANDANA SONI ALIAS VANDANA MEHTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/17079/2026 · 2026-05-27

Namit Kumar

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 115 Vandana Soni @ Vandana Mehta State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the 08.12.2022 (Annexure P (Annexure P has been sought for directing respondent allowance and other service benefits suspension, alongwith interest. wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Tribunal/competent Court 27.05.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Vandana Soni @ Vandana Mehta Versus State of Punjab & others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Shrey Goel, Advocate, for the NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the 08.12.2022 (Annexure P-2) and impugned letter dated (Annexure P-3) issued by the respondents. has been sought for directing respondent allowance and other service benefits to her suspension, alongwith interest. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the competent Court of jurisdiction. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 27.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH WP-17079-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 …Petitioner ...Respondent NAMIT KUMAR Shrey Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the suspension order dated 2) and impugned letter dated 14.12.2023 issued by the respondents. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought for directing respondent No.7 to grant salary, subsistence to her w.e.f. 08.12.2022 i.e. the date of After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the . as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Yes/No The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of dated 14.12.2023 Further, a writ of mandamus No.7 to grant salary, subsistence 08.12.2022 i.e. the date of After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.27 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.