215.1 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV STATE OF CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. on 02.09.2022 in the Haryana Government Gazette (Extra), and a pe 04 years has expired. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further, with liberty to the petitioner that, in case the said Ordinance has been converted into law by an appropriate Notification, liberty be granted t 2. 27-05-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21760 Date of Decision : ASHOK KUMAR YADAV VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Prithvi Raj Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Kanchan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG Haryana. Mr. Pradip Bhandari, Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, challenge is to the Ordinance published on 02.09.2022 in the Haryana Government Gazette (Extra), and a pe 04 years has expired. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further, with liberty to the petitioner that, in case the said Ordinance has been converted into law by an appropriate Notification, liberty be granted to challenge the same by filing an appropriate remedy. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 21760-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI DEEPAK MANCHANDA Prithvi Raj Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Kanchan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG Haryana. Mr. Pradip Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, challenge is to the Ordinance published on 02.09.2022 in the Haryana Government Gazette (Extra), and a period of 04 years has expired. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further, with liberty to the petitioner that, in case the said Ordinance has been converted into law by an appropriate Notification, o challenge the same by filing an appropriate remedy. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, challenge is to the Ordinance published riod of 04 years has expired. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further, with liberty to the petitioner that, in case the said Ordinance has been converted into law by an appropriate Notification, SAPNA GOYAL 2026.05.29 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document