Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2796 (PNJ)

ASHOK KUMAR v. VED PARKASH JAIN AND OTHERS

CR/6157/2022 · 2026-05-19

Nidhi Gupta

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 125+301 Ashok Kum Ved Parka CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the order d Controller, under Orde filed by th present rev amicably re parties, the revision pe Civil Revision No.6157 of 2022 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Misc. No.10 Civil Revision N Date of decision Kumar …..Applic Versus Parkash Jain and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present revision rder dated 30.9.2022 (Annexure P-4) roller, Ludhiana, whereby the applica r Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismi The present application (CM by the applicant-petitioner stating th nt revision petition, the dispute inte ably resolved. In view of the comprom es, the applicant-petitioner does not in ion petition and seeks permission to w O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH . No.10423-CII-2026 in/and ion No.6157 of 2022 (O & M) cision :-19.05.2026 Applicant-Petitioner …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate vocate vision petition is for setting aside 4) passed by the learned Rent pplication filed by the petitioner missed. (CM-10423-CII-2026) has been ting that during pendency of the inter se the parties has been mpromise arrived at between the not intend to pursue the present n to withdraw the same. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.21 17.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the present petition be compromis the present ordered to b the submis application withdraw revision pe of. May 19, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.6157 of 2022 (O & Learned counsel for the applic resent application may kindly be allo ion be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the respon romise effected between the parties a resent application is allowed and the red to be dismissed as withdrawn. Keeping in view the contents o ubmissions made by learned counsel cation is allowed. The applicant draw the present revision petition. ion petition stands dismissed as withd Pending application(s), if any , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 2 applicant-petitioner submits that e allowed and the main revision respondents admits the factum of rties and has no objection in case nd the main revision petition is tents of the application as well as unsel for the parties, the present icant-petitioner is permitted to tition. Consequently, the main withdrawn. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.21 17.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document