CWP-16182-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 271 Amandeep Singh & others State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Standing Counsel and Ms. Priya Jarial, Advocate, JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J 1. The matter relates to pipelines on the road avoid flood like situation. 2. On that respondents No.2 and 5 have taken a stand that culverts have been laid, there is still water logging in the area. He asserts that respondents No.2 and 5 have not laid any culvert under the connecting village Chotian to village Bhalaiana and on the roads connecting other villages. He asserts that culverts laid by respondents No.2 and 5 under the road to village Kothe Chet Singh Wale are inadequate and affected areas still experience wate matter and file an affidavit after associating all parties. 3. As be taken have already been taken and nothing further can be done. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Amandeep Singh & others Versus Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Tajinder Pal Singh Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Standing Counsel and Ms. Priya Jarial, Advocate, for responden JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The matter relates to pipelines on the road avoid flood like situation. On 26.02.2026, the following order was passed “Counsel for the petitioner has asserted that despite the fact that respondents No.2 and 5 have taken a stand that culverts have been laid, there is still water logging in the area. He asserts that respondents No.2 and 5 have not laid any culvert under the connecting village Chotian to village Bhalaiana and on the roads connecting other villages. He asserts that culverts laid by respondents No.2 and 5 under the road to village Kothe Chet Singh Wale are inadequate and affected areas still experience wate List on 21.04.2026. Let Deputy Commissioner, Sri Muktsar Sahib, look into the matter and file an affidavit after associating all parties. s per learned counsel for the respondents, the steps which could be taken have already been taken and nothing further can be done. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16182-2022 Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Standing Counsel and for respondents No.2 to 5. The matter relates to pipelines on the roads under construction to 26.02.2026, the following order was passed by this Court: Counsel for the petitioner has asserted that despite the fact that respondents No.2 and 5 have taken a stand that culverts have been laid, there is still water logging in the area. He asserts that respondents No.2 and 5 have not laid any culvert under the road connecting village Chotian to village Bhalaiana and on the roads connecting other villages. He asserts that culverts laid by respondents No.2 and 5 under the road to village Kothe Chet Singh Wale are inadequate and affected areas still experience water logging. Let Deputy Commissioner, Sri Muktsar Sahib, look into the matter and file an affidavit after associating all parties.” per learned counsel for the respondents, the steps which could be taken have already been taken and nothing further can be done. under construction to Counsel for the petitioner has asserted that despite the fact that respondents No.2 and 5 have taken a stand that culverts have been laid, there is still water logging in the area. He asserts that road connecting village Chotian to village Bhalaiana and on the roads connecting other villages. He asserts that culverts laid by respondents No.2 and 5 under the road to village Kothe Chet Singh Wale are Let Deputy Commissioner, Sri Muktsar Sahib, look into the per learned counsel for the respondents, the steps which could VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.21 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16182-2022 4. A period of 4 years ha to construction and as per the respondents all the effecti been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to dispute the aforestated position. 5. Disposed of. 6. The petitioners are at liberty to avail remed law, if cause survives. 21.04.2026 Vimal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- A period of 4 years has already passed away. The matter relates to construction and as per the respondents all the effecti been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to dispute the aforestated position. Disposed of. The petitioners are at liberty to avail remed law, if cause survives. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No already passed away. The matter relates to construction and as per the respondents all the effective steps have already been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to dispute the The petitioners are at liberty to avail remedy as permissible by (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No already passed away. The matter relates ve steps have already been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to dispute the by VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.21 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document