Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2732 (PNJ)

KAUSHIK CHATTERJEE v. GAJRAJ AND ORS

COCP/2374/2020 · 2026-03-06

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 201 Kaushik C Gajraj and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o order and j titled as “A has recours proceeding 30.3.2022, either at r counsel for petitioner. COCP-2374-2020 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2374 o Date of decision shik Chatterjee Versus aj and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of the directions of Hon’ble S r and judgment 02.7.2014 in Crimina as “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar Learned counsel for the State recourse to an alternative remedy as eedings are not the appropriate course It is seen that on the last .2022, 25.4.2023 and 22.8.2023 the r at request or due to non-appeara sel for the petitioner. Today again ioner. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2374 of 2020 (O & M) cision :-06.03.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging ’ble Supreme Court issued vide riminal Appeal No.1277 of 2014 Bihar and another”. State submits that the petitioner dy as per law and that contempt ourse of action. last four dates i.e. 15.1.2021, the matter has been adjourned ppearance on behalf of learned again none appears on behalf of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner present litig of the Cou petitioner has adopte neither the pursuing th option exce March 06 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2374-2020 (O & M) A bare reading of the abo ioner has exhibited an utterly casual a nt litigation. It is to be appreciated tha e Court has been expended in affo ioner in the interest of justice. On the dopted an utterly casual and careless er the petitioner nor his counsel a ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, 6, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 e above facts shows that the sual attitude in the pursuit of the ted that very valuable public time n affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the petitioner areless approach. It is clear that nsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document