COCP-1637 IN THE HI 215 Satish Kuma Ajit Balaji Jo CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. order dated by the petit 30.05.2022 connected m by each peti alongwith in 2. reply dated Chief Admin was stated as 1637-2023 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Kumar Versus alaji Joshi M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been f dated 21.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) pass petitioner which has been disposed 2022 (Annexure P-2) passed in C cted matters, whereby it was directed petition in those schemes, also wou th interest as specified hereinabove. Learned counsel for the respond dated 15.04.2024 filed by way of affid Adminstratory, Housing Board Harya ated as follows:- “4. That it is submitted that 21.12.2022 passed in CWP N Satish Kumar Vs Housing Bo amount of Rs.6,07,876/- was pa No. 2095 dated 23.06.2023 (Co ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1637-2023 Date of Decision: 12.01.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the respondent. been filed alleging violation of the 1) passed in CWP-28847-2022 filed sposed of in terms of order dated in CWP-19124-2021 and other rected that ‘.....the money deposited would be refunded by 31.10.2022 ove. espondent refers to para No.4 of the f affidavit of Sh. T.L. Satyaparkash, Haryana, Panchkula, wherein in it that in compliance of order dated P No. 28847 of 2022 titled as g Board Haryan and others an s paid to the petitioner vide RTGS (Copy attached as annexure R-I). the filed ated ther ed 22 the ash, in it ed as an S I). RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.13 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1637 3. the avermen against the accordingly. 4. the case hav the matter petitioner. 5. required to b of according 6. 7. 12.01.2026 rishu 1637-2023 -2- The calculations of refundabl please. Sr. No. Particulars 1. Registration Amount 2. Interest w.e.f. 01.07. 12.06.2023 for 3268 3.20% PA 3. Amount received after successful applicants 4. Interest w.e.f. 05.05. 12.02.2023 for 2960 3.20% PA 5. Total 6. Less 10% TDS on amount 7. Net refundable amoun Learned counsel for the respon erments made in para No. 4 repro t the petitioner and the instant pe ingly. There is no representation on b se having been called twice. Even on atter was adjourned at the request In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable dable amount is given as under Amount Rs.1,92,000 1.07.2014 to 268 days @ Rs. 55,010 after draw of nts Rs.2,97,000 5.05.2015 to 960 days @ Rs. 77,074 Rs.6,21,084 on interest Rs. 13,208 ount Rs.6,07,876 respondent submits that in view of reproduced above nothing is due ant petition may be disposed of, n on behalf of the petitioner despite ven on the last 02 dates of hearing, equest of learned counsel for the above, no further orders are tition and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No er of due pite ring, the are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.13 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.