MUKHTIAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/33125/2022 · 2026-04-06
Sumeet Goel
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2704 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2704 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
236 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.33125 of 2022
Date of Decision: 06.04.2026
Date of Uploading: 06.04.2026
Mukhtiar Singh and another …..Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
***** Present:- None for the petitioners.
Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. A.G, Punjab.
SUMEET GOEL, J.(Oral)
The petition in hand has been filed with the following substantive prayer:
“For issuance of directions to the official respondents to initiate action under Section 182 IPC against private respondents No.4 to 6 who have intentionally given false complaint to respondent No.3 with ulterior motive to harass the petitioners and family members of petitioner No. 1.
AND For issuance of directions to the officials respondents to look into the representations dated 19.4.2022 & 13.5.2022 (P-7 & YAG DUTT 2026.04.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M No.33125 of 2022 -2-
P-8) submitted by petitioners and to initiate action in accordance with law.”
2.
None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
3.
Learned State counsel, while referring to the reply dated 22.11.2023, has submitted that the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous.
4.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
5.
Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.
(SUMEET GOEL) April 06, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.04.06 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document