$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 526/2022 TILOTTAMA MITRA JOLLY .....Petitioner Through: None. versus JANMEET SINGH JOLLY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant Mudgal, Advocate via video-conferencing. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 11.02.2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called- out. The same was the position on the last date. Learned counsel for the respondent submits, that the petition under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, filed by the petitioner has been dismissed vide order dated 09.12.2025. Counsel undertakes to place a certified copy of the said order on record during the course of the day. In view of the above, it would appear that nothing survive in the present petition, which also explain the absence of the petitioner from the proceedings. The petition is accordingly disposed-of as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J FEBRUARY 11, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 12:17:21