CWP-29344 IN TH 222 Kanwar Sing The Punjab S CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. of the Consti the nature of (Annexure P full pension directing the he has compl 1 344-2022 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA CWP Date r Singh VERSUS njab State Power Corporation Limited HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA Ms. Garima Arora, Advocate fo the petitioner. Mr. Bhupinder Banga, Advocate 7. Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab. REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has be Constitution of India for issuance of ure of certiorari for quashing the im ure P-10) which arbitrarily denies th nsion on completion of 25 years of ng the respondents to grant benefit of completed more than 25 years of regul NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-29344-2022 Date of Decision: January 21, 2026 .....Petitioner SUS imited and others ..Responden HARPREET SINGH BRAR cate for Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate for vocate for respondents No.1 to 5 and unjab. been filed under Article 226/227 ce of an appropriate writ or order in the impugned order dated 27.01.2022 nies the right of the petitioner to get rs of service and further prayed for fit of full pension to the petitioner as f regular service. 2026 itioner ondents te for and /227 der in .2022 to get ed for ner as PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.27 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29344 2. was passed: 3. issue has be connected ca Punjab and o be disposed o 4. parties, the Bhathal’s ca 5. January 21 P.C 2 344-2022 On the last date of hearing i.e. 1 ssed:- “Learned counsel for r submits that the controversy in squarely covered by the judgm CWP-7658-2015, titled as Tejin Versus State of Punjab and othe Learned counsel for the p go through the above said judgm On his request, adjourned Today, learned counsel for the has been decided by this Court in ed cases, titled as Tejinder Singh B and others, pronounced on 19.08.20 osed of in terms of the said judgment. In view of the above statement m , the present petition is dismissed case (supra). Pending application(s), if any, 21, 2026 Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable. : g i.e. 14.01.2026, the following order or respondents No.1 to 5 and 7 sy involved in the present case is dgment rendered by this Court in Tejinder Singh Bhathal and others others. the petitioner seeks adjournment to udgment. rned to 21.01.2026.” r the parties are ad idem that similar urt in CWP No.7658 of 2015 and gh Bhathal and others Vs. State of .08.2025 and the present petition may ment. ment made by learned counsel for the issed in terms of Tejinder Singh any, shall also stand(s) disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE easoned. : Yes/No Yes/No order d 7 e is rt in hers t to imilar and te of n may or the ingh ed of. RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.01.27 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document