CRM-M-61603-20 IN THE H (301-1) MANGALJIT K STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. V Mr. MANISHA BATR 1. The p Nagarik Suraksha bearing No.039 Station Jodhewa dated 18.02.2022 Police Station emanating theref P-3). 2. This appear before the Magistrate was d compromise. 2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CRM Date KAUR AND ORS Versus
NJAB AND ANR. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the p Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab Naveen Sharma, Advocate for r ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed raksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) registered under Sections 323, al, District Ludhiana, which is 2 registered under Sections 323 Jodhewal, District Ludhiana from on the basis of compromi This Court vide order dated 03.11.20 re the trial Court to get their stateme was directed to send his report q JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-61603-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.01.2026
... Petitioner
...Respondents
ANISHA BATRA
r the petitioners
respondent No2. under Section 428 of Bharatiya for quashing of cross version , 341 and 34 of IPC at Police a cross-version to FIR No.30 3, 325, 148 and 149 of IPC at and subsequent proceedings ise dated 20.09.2025 (Annexure .11.2025 had directed the parties to statements recorded and the learned port qua the genuineness of the
a n e 0 t s e es to rned the AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-61603-20 3. Pursu learned Judicial recorded. On the submitted report d effected between influence. 4. Learn not disputed the fa 5. In vi continue with the p 6. Follo this Court in Kulw 2007 (3) RCR (Cr Gian Singh Versu is allowed and cr and 34 of IPC a version to FIR N and 149 of IPC proceedings ema (Annexure P-3) a 2025 (O&M) 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, part icial Magistrate First Class, Ludhia n the basis of the statements so reco eport dated 09.12.2025 to the effect t tween the parties voluntarily and wi Learned State counsel as well as cou the factum of compromise between th In view of the above, no useful th the proceedings before the trial Cou Following the principles laid down b Kulwinder Singh and others Versus (Criminal) 1052 and approved by ersus State of Punjab and others (2 ross version bearing No.039 reg at Police Station Jodhewal, Distr No.30 dated 18.02.2022 registere at Police Station Jodhewal, Di anating therefrom on the basis o are quashed qua the petitioners. r, parties have appeared before the Ludhiana and got their statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has ffect that the compromise has been nd without any coercion or undue as counsel for respondent No.2 has een the parties. seful purpose would be served to al Court in the instant FIR. own by the Full Bench judgment of ersus State of Punjab and another ed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition gistered under Sections 323, 341 rict Ludhiana, which is a cross- ed under Sections 323, 325, 148 istrict Ludhiana and subsequent of compromise dated 20.09.2025 e the ents has been ndue s d to nt of her rt in tition 1 - 8 t 5 AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-61603-20 FIR No.30 dated 1 IPC at Police Stat emanating therefro P-3) are quashed q 27.01.2026 Amit Sharma 2025 (O&M) 3 ated 18.02.2022 registered under Sect ce Station Jodhewal, District Ludhian herefrom on the basis of compromise shed qua the petitioners. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
er Sections 323, 325, 148 and 149 of udhiana and subsequent proceedings romise dated 20.09.2025 (Annexure (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
49 of ings xure AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.