RSA-3417- IN THE HIG 226 Harvinder K Charanjit Ka CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent whereby the 2. was issued in the matter w matter was appellants i. of non-appe 14.09.2022 3. listed for he this Court:- -2013 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o der Kaur and another Versus Kaur and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Harnesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. GS Sullar, Advocate for the Mr. Divyansh Vats, Advocate fo Mr. HS Batth, Advocate for resp I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiffs are in rrent judgments and decrees rendered by their suit for declaration was dismis The matter pertains to the yea sued in the same way back vide order atter was listed for hearing 09 times, was adjourned either at the reques ants i.e. on 16.01.2017, 07.02.2019 a appearance on behalf of the ap 2022 and 03.05.2024. On the last date of hearing 15 for hearing following order was passe - ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3417-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for for the appellants. cate for for respondents No. 1, 3 and 5. are in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts dismissed. he year 2013 and notice of motion order dated 27.11.2014. Thereafter, imes, out of which on 06 dates, the request of learned counsel for the 019 and 19.12.2022 or on account he appellant i.e. on 19.12.2014, 15.10.2024, when this case was s passed by a co-ordinate Bench of the urts tion fter, the the ount , was RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3417- 4. received as received bac 5. despite his b such, learned in the matter 6. the appellant pendency of more than 12 as no attemp a new couns interested in 7. dismissed fo move an app for reviving 8. 18.03.2026 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- “Learned counsel for the not been able to file fresh corre 4. In view thereof, let notice returnable 03.02.2025.” Pursuant thereto, office report ed as per which notices issued to bo ed back unserved due to incomplete ad Today, learned counsel for t e his best efforts, he is unable to establ learned counsel for the appellants has p matter. In view of the aforesaid premis pellants would be a futile exercise. It a ncy of the present second appeal befo 12 years, the appellants have lost attempt has been made by them to con counsel. It is, therefore, clear that th ted in pursuing the present matter. Be that as it may, the insta ssed for non-prosecution, however, an appropriate application within a pe iving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable r the appellants states that he has correct address of respondent No. tice be issued to the appellants, report dated 29.01.2025 has been to both the appellants have been lete address. for the appellants reiterates that establish contact with his client. As ts has pleaded ‘no fresh instructions’ mise, issuance of fresh notices to ise. It appears that due to sheer long al before this Court for a period of lost interest in pursuing the same, to contact their counsel or to engage that the appellants are not seriously instant regular second appeal is with liberty to the appellants to in a period of 04 weeks from today any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No as o. ts, een een that . As to long d of me, age usly l is to day RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.