IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 120-7 Sanjay Gupta and Hema Mahajan CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. None for the respondent. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The impugned Complaint bearing NACT No. titled “Hema Mahajan V. C&C 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 403 and 420 of the summoning order dated dated 12.01.202 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh as well as order dated 12.07.2022 NACT No.712 of 2020 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after incorporating the new grounds that have emerged in the interregnum. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pendi 16.04.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55580 Date of decision: Sanjay Gupta and others VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ . Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner None for the respondent. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for seeking quashing of the impugned Complaint bearing NACT No.712 of 2020 dated Hema Mahajan V. C&C Towers Ltd. and Ors.” Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (as amended) 403 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; setting aside the impugned summoning order dated 13.01.2020 and quashing of non 12.01.2021 and 12.07.2022 issued/passed against the petitioners Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh as well as order dated 12.07.2022 as well as proceedings in 712 of 2020. earned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner hdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after incorporating the new grounds that have emerged in the interregnum. In view of the above, the present petition is withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 55580-2023(O&M) Date of decision: 16.04.2026 ...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate for the petitioners. ed for seeking quashing of the of 2020 dated 09/13.01.2020 Towers Ltd. and Ors.” filed under Section (as amended) read with Section ; setting aside the impugned .01.2020 and quashing of non-bailable warrants /passed against the petitioners by the Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh as well as staying the operation of the as well as proceedings in the Complaint bearing earned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks hdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after incorporating the new grounds that have emerged in the interregnum. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as ng application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.17 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document