SEWA RAM v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS
LPA/768/2022 · 2026-04-21
Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2303 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2303 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-768-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2026 SEWA RAM ....Appellant Versus UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral)
1. Though the matter had been mentioned on behalf of the appellant, but despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal.
2. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, is present for the respondents-State.
3. Perusal of the order sheets reveals that on the last two occasions also, none had appeared on behalf of the appellant. In such circumstances, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution.
4. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.
(ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA)
JUDGE
(ROHIT KAPOOR) 21.04.2026 JUDGE mohit goyal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.04.22 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document