IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 + 244 CM-5744-C-2022 in/and RSA-4531-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.11.2024 Rajinder Singh ...Appellant Versus Satnam Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Sweta, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate/Legal Aid Counsel for applicant/respondent No.2. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) CM-5744-C-2022 Learned counsel for the applicant states that the application seeking preponement has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and the same be disposed of accordingly. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. RSA No.4531 of 2018 1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Same was the position on the previous date of hearing i.e. 20.05.2024, when the following order was passed:- “There is no representation on behalf of either of the parties. Same was the position on earlier three consecutive hearings. SUMIT KUMAR 2024.12.02 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment RSA-4531-2018 -2- In the interest of justice, adjourned to 29.11.2024. Registry to notify the next date of hearing to learned counsel for the parties.” 2. As per office report, learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate, has been notified. 3. In view of the present factual matrix, there is no other option for the Court but to infer that the appellant is not serious to pursue the instant appeal. 4. The present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (VIKAS SURI) November 29, 2024 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2024.12.02 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment