IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 208 Raghubir Sharan Rajesh Khullar, IAS CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) violation of order dated 02.8.2022 predecessor “Raghubir Sharan vs. The State of Haryana and another petition was all the period of petitioner’s service/duty from 06.10.1971 to 05.4.1972 on the post of JBT teacher in the time scale of Rs.125 for increment on the post of clerk in the time scale of Rs.110 160/5-225 to which he was appointed from 06.4.1972. Necessary exercise be carried out and consequential monetary benefits be paid to the petitioner with interest @4% per annum from the due date till payment, within four months of the supply of copy of t COCP-2059-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2059 of 2023 Date of decision : Raghubir Sharan Versus Rajesh Khullar, IAS and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Petitioner Raghubir Sharan in person with Mr. Dr. Kiran Pal Singh, Advocate. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of order dated 02.8.2022 (Annexure P predecessor Bench of this Court in CWP Raghubir Sharan vs. The State of Haryana and another petition was allowed and the respondents were directed to the period of petitioner’s service/duty from 06.10.1971 to 05.4.1972 on the post of JBT teacher in the time scale of Rs.125 for increment on the post of clerk in the time scale of Rs.110 225 to which he was appointed from 06.4.1972. Necessary exercise be carried out and consequential monetary benefits be paid to the petitioner with interest @4% per annum from the due date till payment, within four months of the supply of copy of t 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2059 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Petitioner Raghubir Sharan in person with Mr. Dr. Kiran Pal Singh, Advocate. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a Bench of this Court in CWP-10426-2001 titled as Raghubir Sharan vs. The State of Haryana and another”, whereby the owed and the respondents were directed to “…count the period of petitioner’s service/duty from 06.10.1971 to 05.4.1972 on the post of JBT teacher in the time scale of Rs.125-5-150/5-250; for increment on the post of clerk in the time scale of Rs.110-4-130/5- 225 to which he was appointed from 06.4.1972. Necessary exercise be carried out and consequential monetary benefits be paid to the petitioner with interest @4% per annum from the due date till payment, within four months of the supply of copy of this order…”. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.07 19.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document person that only part compliance of the Writ Court order dated 02.8.2022 has been made; inasmuch as nothing has been paid to him for the increment on the post of clerk held by him. said submissions on behalf of petitioner and has referred to the reply dated 04.9.2024. In particular, reference is made to 23, 26 and 28 of the O District Education Officer, Narnaul, wherein it is recorded :- Sr. No. Date 8. 23.06.1978 10. 01.4.1979 17. 01.1.1986 23. 01.1.1991 26. 01.7.1992 28. 01.1.1994 the petitioner, have thereupon. assertions of the learned State counsel and submits that all payments due to him have not been released. COCP-2059-2023 (O & M) It is submitted by the petitioner, who is appearing in person that only part compliance of the Writ Court order dated 02.8.2022 has been made; inasmuch as nothing has been paid to him for the increment on the post of clerk held by him. Learned counsel for the State has controverted the above said submissions on behalf of petitioner and has referred to the reply dated 04.9.2024. In particular, reference is made to 23, 26 and 28 of the Order No.846 dated 31.8.2024 passed District Education Officer, Narnaul, wherein it is recorded Date BP BP BP 23.06.1978 145 2 Additional increment Higher qualification 01.4.1979 150 490+48 PP 400-10 600 Grade 01.1.1986 1325 01.1.1991 1475 01.7.1992 1550 01.1.1994 1600 It is submitted that thereafter the petitioner, have also been duly released to him alongwith interest thereupon. The petitioner strongly assertions of the learned State counsel and submits that all payments due to him have not been released. Heard. 2 It is submitted by the petitioner, who is appearing in person that only part compliance of the Writ Court order dated 02.8.2022 has been made; inasmuch as nothing has been paid to him for the increment on the post of clerk held by him. rned counsel for the State has controverted the above said submissions on behalf of petitioner and has referred to the reply dated 04.9.2024. In particular, reference is made to Sr. Nos.8, 10, 17, rder No.846 dated 31.8.2024 passed by the District Education Officer, Narnaul, wherein it is recorded as follows BP Remarks grade 2 Additional increment Higher qualification 10-490/540-15-600 EB-20- 600 Grade revised 950-1500 Grade Revised Additional increment Additional increment Higher Standard scale thereafter the increments payable to been duly released to him alongwith interest The petitioner strongly controverts the abovesaid assertions of the learned State counsel and submits that all payments VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.07 19.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document learned counsel for the State and the Order No.846 dated 31.8.2024, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same is hereby disposed of challenge the order dated No.846 dated 31.8.2024 as per law, if so required. April 06, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2059-2023 (O & M) In view of the above noted facts and the reply filed by learned counsel for the State and the Order No.846 dated 31.8.2024, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner challenge the order dated No.846 dated 31.8.2024 as per law, if so Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 In view of the above noted facts and the reply filed by learned counsel for the State and the Order No.846 dated 31.8.2024, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same is . However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated No.846 dated 31.8.2024 as per law, if so Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.07 19.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document