HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2211 of 2022 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Abhishek, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State and perused the records. 3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants Raj Pal Singh and Anurag Singh, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 7126 of 2018, arising out of case crime No. 51 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406, 342 I.P.C., P.S.- Pallavpuram, District Meerut, pending in the court of ACJM, (S.D.), Court No.7, Meerut and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the said case. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by this Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned vide order dated 02.01.2026 verified the said compromise, copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the said proposition. 6. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek, Anurag Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Singh, G.A. Raj Pal Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance/summoning order as prayed for by the applicant(s). 8. The present application is allowed. 9. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case are is quashed. May 12, 2026 M. ARIF A482 No. 2211 of 2022 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad