APHC010527762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7855/2022 Between: 1. KOLLU MUTHYALA RAO, S/O. TATAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPUSALAMARRU VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.- A2 2. KOLLU PEDDINTLAMMA,, W/O. MUTHYLA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPUSALAMARRU VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.-A3 3. KOLLU NAGAMALESWAR RAO,, S/O. MUTHYLA RAO, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPUSALAMARRU VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.-A4 4. KOPPADA DURGA,, W/O. NAGARAJU AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPUSALAMARRU VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.-A5 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. KOLLU ANUSHA, W/O. SRINIVASU, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O. MATLAM VILLAGE, KRUTHIVENNU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHAR PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT A.P AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KRUTHIVENU P.S., KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): 2 Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceeding against the petitioners in connection with C.C.NO.296/2022 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bantumilli, Krishna District against the petitioners and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in connection with C.C.No.296/2022 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bantumilli, Krishna District against the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Mr.P.Abhinav Yadav, learned counsel representing Mr.P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, reported to the Court that, upon instructions, a statement is being made to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 2. Owing to the said statement, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. 3. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 19-06-2026 BMS