APHC010435852022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6700/2022 Between: 1. G.LAKSHMI PRASAD, S/O. LATE G. SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. COMMISSIONER, STATE TAXES (RETIRED), FLOT NO.203, CHAMUNDESWARINILAYAM, SUNDAR NAGAR, NEAR E.S.I HOSPITAL, SANATH NAGAR, HYDERBAD-38 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, (COORDINATION AND I/C ANDHRA) ACB, A.P. VIJAYAWADA. 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ACB. VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings no.1/ACB-JD(A)/2018 dated 09-01-2018 of the 1st respondent and the Criminal Proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner in Crime (FIR) no.2 of 2018, dt.27-01-2018 on the file of Inspector of Police, ACB, Visakhapatnam and pass 2 GTK, J Crl.P.No.6700 of 2022 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in connection with Crime in (FIR) No. 2 of 2018 Dt. 27.01.2018 on the file of Inspector of Police, ACB, Visakhapatnam registered by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the quash petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. K R PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. S.SYAM SUNDER RAO SC cum Spl P.P. For ACB 2. The Court made the following: 3 GTK, J Crl.P.No.6700 of 2022 ORDER: On a perusal of the earlier order passed by this Court on 30.08.2022, it is evident that this Court has directed the prosecution not to file the charge sheet until further orders and investigation to continue. 2. Mr.K.R.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that he received instructions from his client to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 3. Owing to the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order dated 30.08.2022 in the present Criminal Petition stands vacated. 4. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 17-06-2026 BMS