Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1711 (AP)

GUDIPUDI SRIDHAR BABU v. SMT. Y.SRI LAKSHMI

CC/5896/2022 · 2026-06-15

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010625432022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5896/2022 Between: 1. GUDIPUDI SRIDHAR BABU, S/O. LATE VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARSM OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 40-9-7/1, TURUPUKAMMAPALEM, 4TH LANE, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM, DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT Y SRI LAKSHMI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI M VENKATESWARLU COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI A S DINESH KUMAR, SPECIAL OFFICER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT R J VIDYULATHA, DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING FOR THE STATE OF GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, CHINAKAKANI, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the respondent authorities herein before this Honourable Court and punish them for violation their undertaking/admission and willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders 2 passed by this Honourable Court in W.P. No. 8667 of 2022 dt. 20.04.2022, in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. C SUMON 3. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.5896 of 2022 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and stated that orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 16.06.2026 KBN 4 55 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.5896 of 2022 16.06.2026 KKBBNN