Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1697 (AP)

SRINIVASA MINERALS AND TRADERS LTD v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/26099/2022 · 2026-05-03

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010419322022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26099 of 2022 Between: 1. SRINIVASA MINERALS AND TRADERS LTD, REPRESENTED THROUGH IT'S DIRECTOR, MR. BODDA NAGA SARAT CHANDRA, S/O. LATE SURYA GANGA RAO BODDA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, DOOR. NO. 9- 13-45-40, 1-1, MEHER APARTMENT, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM(URBAN), ANDHRA PRADESH, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR. 3. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY IT'S SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MINES, SHASTRIBHAVAN, NEW DELHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not granting mining lease to the petitioner for Manganese ore in an extent of 7.284 Hectares of land situated in Marrivalasa Village, Gajapathinagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent in not granting mining lease to the petitioner for Manganese ore in an extent of 7.284 Hectares of land situated in Marrivalasa Village, Gajapathinagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith grant mining lease to the petitioner for Manganese ore in an extent of 7.284 Hectares of land situated in Marrivalasa Village, Gajapathinagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District pending disposal of this Writ Petition and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATHEESH KUMAR EERLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VIJAYA KUMARI(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26099 of 2022 The Court made the following Order: Questioning the inaction of the respondent authorities in not granting the mining lease in respect of major mineral Manganese Ore at Marrivalasa Village, Gajapathinagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology submits that in view of change of policy in respect of Manganese Ore which is a major mineral and as such, the instant Writ Petition is not maintainable. 3. At that juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, granting liberty to work out his legal remedies in accordance with the law. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology reported no objection. 4 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is withdrawn as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to workout out his legal remedies in accordance with the law. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 04.05.2026 PSA