Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1673 (KAR)

SMT PRABHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1904/2012 · 2026-07-23

E S Indiresh

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION No.1904 OF 2012 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. PRABHA D/O MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDENT OF EKARAJAPURA VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE THASILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS A.R., AGA) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2010 BEARING NO. REVISION PETITION 149(6) 2006-07 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, VIDE ANNEXURE-L. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of intimating the petitioner, she is not giving him necessary instructions to go on with the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE AG