M/s. Satya Krishna Constructions v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/37039/2022 · 2026-04-07
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010619522022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37039/2022 Between:
1. M/S. SATYA KRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT DOOR. NO. 47-2-2, GANDHIPURAM- 1, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI KARRI SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. SURREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, IBRAHIMPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, HAVING OFFICE AT 78-7-10, GANDHIPURAM-3, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST.GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE DISTRICT SAND OFFICER, HAVING OFFICE AT NEAR M-6 HOTEL, JN. ROAD, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2
6. THE SUB COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJ AHMAHENDRAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE TAHSILDHAR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
8. M/S J P POWER VENTURES LTD, H.NO- 40-14-7, 2ND FLOOR, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA-520010. (RESPONDENT NO. 8 IS NOT NECESSARY PARTY)
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Ex.P1 order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the respondent no.3 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent nos. 3 to 5 to execute a lease deed in favour of petitioner firm in respect of land admeasuring Acres 1-25 Cents southern side part out of full extent of Acres 3-35 Cents situated in R.S. No. 583/2 of Rajahmahendravaram Town and Urban Mandal, East Godavari District and to pay monthly rent from October 2019 onwards and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the direct the respondent nos.
3 to 5 to execute a lease deed in favour of petitioner firm in respect of land admeasuring Acres 1-25 CeIlts southern side part out of full extent of Acres 3-35 Cents situated in R.S. No. 583/2 of Rajahmahendravaram Town and Urban Mandal, East Godavari District and to pay monthly rent from October 2019 onwards and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37039 of 2022 ORDER:-
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer:
“….to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Ex.P1 order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the respondent no.3 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent nos. 3 to 5 to execute a lease deed in favour of petitioner firm in respect of land admeasuring Acres 1-25 Cents southern side part out of full extent of Acres 3-35 Cents situated in R.S. No. 583/2 of Rajahmahendravaram Town and Urban Mandal, East Godavari District and to pay monthly rent from October 2019 onwards and pass….”
2. Sri S. Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to work out petitioner’s legal remedies in accordance with law, in view of subsequent events that have taken place in the lis, for which the respondents have no objection. 3. Accordingly, recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his legal remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 08.04.2026 RMR
4
104 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 37039 of 2022 08.04.2026
W RMR