Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1655 (GAU)

ABDUL JALIL AND 3 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/4882/2022 · 2026-08-23

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/3 GAHC010146042022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2022 ABDUL JALIL AND 3 ORS. S/O- ABDUL JABBAR, VILLAGE- KAPNARPAR, P.O.- PECHALA, DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN 2: ISLAM UDDIN S/O- LATE MAKMAD ALI VILLAGE- BIHAIRDALA P.O.- LEELACHILA DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788734. 3: MONSUR AHMED S/O ANOYAR ALI VILLAGE- JAGANNATHPUR P.O.- LEELACHILA DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788734. 4: SAFIQUE UDDIN SON OF ANWAR ALI VILLAGE- SONAIRPAR P.O. ANIPUR DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788734 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE Page No. 2/3 GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37. 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARIMGANJ ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788710. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARIMGANJ P.O. KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788710. 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DULLAVCHERRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O.- DULLAVCHERRA DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788736. 6:PATIALA GAON PANCHAYAT VILLAGE- PATIALA P.O.- PECHALA DISTRICT KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788734 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 7:THE PRESIDENT PATIALA GAON PANCHAYAT VILLAGE- PATIALA P.O. PECHALA DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788734 Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED, MR. A K AZAD,MR K UDDIN Page No. 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 24.08.2026 Mr. K. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. P. Thapa, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department for the respondent nos. 1 – 3, 5 & 6; and Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant