Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1646 (AP)

Peddinaboina Venkata Karthik, v. PeddinaboinaSrinivasa Rao

SA/440/2022 · 2026-04-07

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010368272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 440/2022 Between: 1. PEDDINABOINA VENKATA KARTHIK,, S/O.SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/O. C/O.RUDRABAPI RAJU, NAVULURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEDDINABOINA MURALI KARTHIK,, S/O.SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, BEING MINOR REP. BY HIS MOTHER, NEXT FRIEND GUARDIAN PEDDINABOINA VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, R/O. C/O.RUDRABAPI RAJU, NAVULURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. PEDDINABOINASRINIVASA RAO, S/O.RAMULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O. AMARAVATHIVILLAGE ANDMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEDDINABOINAVENKATAGIRI, W/O.RAMULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. GOLNAGAR, AMARAVATHI VILLAGEAND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. MUVVAGURAVAIAH, S/O. YEDUKONDALU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O.NALLAPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section ___________ against orderspleased to allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment and decree in AS.No. 24 of 2017 on the file of I Addl. District Judge, Guntur dt. 01-04-2022 as reversing the judgment and decree in OS.No. 751 of 2013 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli Guntur District dt. 07-12-2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to suspend the operation of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned 1St Additional District Judge, Guntur in AS No.24 of 2017, dated 01- 04-2022 pending disposal of the Second Appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. G VIJAYA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 440/2022 JUDGMENT:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants brought to the notice of this Court that they have filed a letter for withdrawal before the Registrar(Judicial) on 06.04.2026 for withdrawing the Second Appeal and the same is placed on record. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 08.04.2026 LSP 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 440/2022 08.04.2026 LSP