Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1635 (CAL)

PARAMITA GHOSH v. SUPORNO PURAKAYASTHA

CO/1590/2022 · 2026-03-18

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.08.2022 168 ss C.O. 1590 of 2022 Smt. Paramita Ghosh Vs. Sri Suporno Purakayastha Ms. Sananda Bhattacharya Ms. Pritha Bhaumik … For the petitioner Mr. Bratin Kr. Dey Mr. Pradip Majumder Ms. Anjana Banerjee Mr. Pradeep Pandey … For the opposite party Learned lawyer appearing for the petitioner on instruction from her client submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the revisional application with liberty to file a revisional application afresh. The written instruction filed by the petitioner be kept on record. I have heard learned lawyer appearing for the opposite party. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the revisional application with liberty to file a revisional application afresh in accordance with law. Accordingly, the revisional application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Rabindranath Samanta, J.)