Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010037932022 2022:GAU-AS:18797 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1547/2022 SANJEEV SUR AND 13 ORS S/O BHUBAN CH. SUR, R/O NEAR NEW POST OFFICE, SAP, OIL COLONY- 1981, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM-786602 2: RENUKA GOGOI D/O HEMANTA KR. GOGOI R/O NA-KHATIA SONOWAL GAON P.O.-MATHAWANI SASONI DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786610 3: PRIYANKA BORDOLOI D/O BAIKUNTHA BORDOLOI R/O CHARIGAON P.O.-BAHONA JORHAT ASSAM-785101 4: ANGSHUMAN BARUAH S/O RONEY BARUAH R/O SAIKIA PRINTERS KALIBARI ROAD DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 5: ANTON BARUAH S/O ANIL BARUAH R/O NO. 4 KAKOJAN TINSUKIA ASSAM-786151 6: SASHANKA JYOTI BORAH Page No.# 2/4 S/O DILIP BORAH R/O SALAGURI NO. 2 SIVASAGAR ASSAM-785666 7: ROHIT SAIKIA S/O AJIT SAIKIA R/O NC GAON DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM-781009 8: ALPITA GOGOI D/O KULEN GOGOI R/O DULIAJAN BAMHUKUTA DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 9: PRANJAL BARUAH D/O PITAMBOR BARUAH R/O NAHARKATIA SASONIA DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786610 10: JAHNOBI GOGOI D/O JATIN GOGOI R/O SAP OIL COLONY NEAR KALIBARI DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 11: SUDARSHAN BORDOLOI S/O BAIKUNTHA KR. BORDOLOI R/O CHARIGAON P.O.-BAHONA JORHAT ASSAM-785101 12: BIVASH GOGOI S/O BOLIN KR. GOGOI R/O 16 NO. TINIALI BORAGADHAI DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 Page No.# 3/4 13: KARISHMA DEORI D/O BIRESWAR DEORI R/O KADAMONI GAON CHABUA DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786184 14: DEEPJYOTI BORUAH S/O KAMAL CH. BORUAH R/O NAKHATIA SONOWAL GAON P.O.-MATHAWANI DIBRUGARH ASSAM-78618 VERSUS OIL INDIA LIMITED AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, FIELD HEAD QUARTERS, DULIAJAN, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM-786602 2:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (HR AND A) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM-78660 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MR A ATREYA,MR. D CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, OIL, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the OIL. Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that he has received instructions from the Page No.# 4/4 petitioners not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant