APHC010381942022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 663/2022 Between: MARAMUDI AMRUTH RAO, S/O. BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. PASUMARRU VILLAGE, PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MOLEPATI VENKATA RAMANA KUMAR, S/O.VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AT HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAMANTHA KRISHNA SRIRAMAKAVACHAM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, impugning the judgment dated 30.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.65 of 2015 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gudivada, which was passed confirming the judgment dated 24.03.2015 passed in C.C.No.639 of 2013 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vuyyuru for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N.I.Act’). 2. Heard Sri O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Samantha Krishna Sriramakavacham, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 / Complainant. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 3. Both parties appeared before this Court and represented that they intend to compromise the matter. An amount of Rs.50,000/- is paid by the Accused to the Complainant before this Court towards final settlement in this matter. Petitioner / Accused would submit that he has three daughters and he got married them. Respondent No.1 would submit that he has no objection to record the compromise and to acquit the Accused by allowing the Criminal Revision Case. 4. Considering the submissions, and in view of the amicable settlement of the matter and in the interests of justice, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the concurrent judgments dated 30.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.65 of 2015 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and 3 Sessions Judge, Gudivada, and dated 24.03.2015 passed in C.C.No.639 of 2013 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Vuyyuru for the offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act and the Petitioner / Accused is acquitted. Respondent No.2 / Complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount, if any, deposited before the trial Court. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is requested to enquire about the genuineness of the statement given by the Petitioner that he got three daughters. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.04.2026 Dinesh 4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:663 OF 2022 Dt.28.04.2026 Dinesh