Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010052672022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : FAO/33/2022 BINA RANI GHOSH AND ANR. W/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA, WARD NO. 1 ,MANGALDAI TOWN, PO AND PS MANGALDAI, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM 2: SMTI SUSMITA GHOSH D/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSA VERSUS MAHIBUL ALAM AND 2 ORS. S/O RUSTOM ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANGALDAI GAON, PO AND PS MANGALDAI, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM 2:MRIDUL KR. GHOSH S/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 3:SRI SUJIT CH. GHOSH S/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN Page No.# 2/4 PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR C GOSWAMI, MR. N CHAKRABARTY Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A SATTAR (R-1), N. CHOUDHURY(R1),R RAHMAN(R1),A. K. KANU(R1),MR M AHMED(R1),MS. N BAROOAH (r-2,3),MS S DAS (r-2,3),MR. R GOSWAMI (r-2,3),O J A BEGUM (R-1),S CHOUDHURY (R-1),G IMTIAZ (R-1) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/1563/2022 BINA RANI GHOSH AND ANR. W/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 2: SMTI SUSMITA GHOSH D/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM VERSUS MAHIBUL ALAM AND 2 ORS. S/O RUSTOM ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANGALDAI GAON PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 2:MRIDUL KR. GHOSH S/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 3:SRI SUJIT CH. GHOSH S/O LATE SUBHASH CH. GHOSH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANTIPARA WARD NO. 1 MANGALDAI TOWN PO AND PS MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR C GOSWAMI Advocate for : appearing for MAHIBUL ALAM AND 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date - 13.07.2026 1. None has appeared for the appellant on call. Mr. M. Ahmed, the learned counsel for the sole respondent is present. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that on the last occasion also when the matter was called on for hearing, the appellant was found absent. 3. Since nobody has appeared for the appellant, when the matter was called on for hearing, though the names of two counsels are reflected in the cause list as the engaged counsel for the appellant, hence, this appeal is dismissed for default. 4. The connected Interlocutory Application is also dismissed for default. Page No.# 4/4 5. The interim order granted in the connected Interlocutory Application stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant