1 APHC010560302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4439/2022 Between: 1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA, W/O SOLOMON RAJU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC- ADVOCATE, R/O FLAT NO- 102, MOVVA MANSION, UNDAVALLI, GUNTUR. PERMANENT R/O HNO- 8-20-26, ULLITHOTA VEEDHI, MADHIREDDYVARI SANDHU, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M ABHISHIKTH KISHORE, OCC- COMMISSIONER, RAJAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. P PRASANTHI, OCC-DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM IN- CHARGE COMMISSIONER, RAJAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 16.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO-4439 OF 2022 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file 2 herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hontle Court in WP No- 26361 of 2021 dated 12.11.2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No: 2 as respondent No: 2 to the above contempt case No: 4439 of 2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 12.11.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.26361 of 2021. 2. After receipt of the notice, the respondents have filed the reply. According to the said reply, the respondents have implemented the orders passed by this Court by removing the godowns in residential area. 3 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, has submitted that the respondents have partially removed and not fully removed. 4. Considering the submissions made by both parties, the contempt case is closed. Since the contempt case is fled against the interim order and the main writ petition is pending, if there is any grievance, the petitioner may agitate the same in the main writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:17.04.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:4439 of 2022 Dated:17.04.2026 GK