HABIBUR RAHAMAN AND 3 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
WP(C)/4824/2022 · 2026-05-24
Anjan Moni Kalita
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1576 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1576 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010145632022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4824/2022 HABIBUR RAHAMAN AND 3 ORS.
S/O TAHUR ALI, VILL.- NO.4 BARUAJHAR, P.O.- BECHIMARI, P.S.- DALGAON, DIST.- DARRANG (ASSAM), PIN- 784514.
2: AHMMED HUSSAIN S/O LT. MUKTAR HUSSAIN
VILL.- NO. 3 CHIKANMATI P.S.- DALGAON P.O.- BECHIMARI PIN- 784514.
3: OMAR ALI S/O LT. OSMAN GONI
VILL. AND P.O.- BECHIMARI P.S.- DALGAON PIN- 784514.
4: AKKAS ALI S/O NASOR ALI
VILL. AND P.O.- BECHIMARI P.S.- DALGAON PIN- 784514 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.
2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 6.
3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DARRANG ZILLA PARISHAD DARRANG MANGALDOI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDOI DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM.
4:THE CHAIRMAN DARRANG ZILLA PARISHAD DARRANG MANGALDOI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDOI DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784115.
5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER BECHIMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDOI DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784115.
6:THE PRESIDENT BECHIMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDOI DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784115 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SARMA, MR. LENTSO,MR. S CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D.,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
ORDER Date : 25.05.2026
Page No.# 3/3
Heard Mr. Lentso, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms P. Thapa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Dutta,
learned counsel for the respondents No.1, 2, 3 and 5.
Mr. Lentso, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant case has become infructuous due to lapse of time.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant