Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1575 (GAU)

ALAUDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/300/2022 · 2026-05-25

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007872022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/300/2022 ALAUDDIN S/O LATE HABIBUR RAHMAN, VILL- DASGRAM (SAHAPUR), P.O.- DASGRAM, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788722 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 4:THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI-781003 5:THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER KARIMGANJ DIST-KARIMGANJ Page No.# 2/3 PIN-788710 6:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER RAMKRISHNA NAGAR KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788166 7:THE TREASURY OFFICER RAMKRISHNA NAGAR SUB-TREASURY DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM-78816 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S Y AHMED, MR. H HAZARIKA,MR. A DAS,H M I HOQUE,MD M ISLAM,MR. M H LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, M KATAKY,SC, FINANCE,SC, AG BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 26.05.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Heard Ms. M. Kataky, learned Standing Counsel, Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Department, appearing for the respondent nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. Ms. M. Kataky, by referring to the report of the mediator dated 12.12.2025, has submitted that during the process of mediation, it was revealed that the petitioner had passed on, during the pendency of the present proceeding. This Court finds that the passing away of the petitioner is also reflected from the Report of the Mediator. However, there is no application submitted by the legal heirs of the original petitioner for substituting themselves in place of the original petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, this Court is left with no other alternative to hold that the present writ petition stands abated. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands closed on being abated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant