Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1549 (GAU)

Jarge Yomcha Tato v. Ngajar Tato

Crl.Rev.P./23/2022 · 2026-04-26

Kardak Ete

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014452022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./23/2022 Jarge Yomcha Tato Wife of Shri Ngajar Tato, Resident of Kamba, PO and PS Khamba, District West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. Phone No. 8974155395 VERSUS Ngajar Tato Son of Shri Penga Tato, Permanent Resident of Village Yaki Tato, PO and PS Khamba, District West Siang (AP) and presently residing at Sipu Colony, Aalo, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : Nani Anju, Komni Riba,T Koyu Advocate for the Respondent : Dicky Panging, D Tamuk,M Doji,Doge Lona,Kirmar Ado BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 27.04.2026 Heard Ms. N. Anju, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the sole respondent. By filing this revision petition, the petitioner has put to challenge the order Page No.# 2/2 dated 31.08.2022, passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Aalo, West Siang District, in Crl. Misc. Appeal No. 01/2022, whereby the said appeal was allowed by setting aside the order dated 25.02.2020, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aalo, in Misc. Case No. 01/2022, arising out of D.V. Case No. 04/2021. During the pendency of this revision petition, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aalo, has disposed of the main case, being D.V. Case No. 04/2021, vide order dated 11.10.2023. In view of above, the present criminal revision petition stands closed as the order impugned is against the interim order of the learned Court below, which would merged with the final order passed in the main proceeding. Criminal revision petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant