Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1545 (GAU)

DR. RUHUL AMIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.

WP(C)/6080/2022 · 2026-04-23

Budi Habung

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010187332022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6080/2022 DR. RUHUL AMIN S/O- LATE HAZRAT ALI, R/O- AZAN NAGAR (IN FRONT OF E AND D OFFICE) WARD NO-7, P.O- GOALPARA, DIST- GOALPARA, ASSAM ,PIN-783101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 3:THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BAHADUR SHAH JAFAR MARG NEW DELHI -110002. 4:THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE VICE-CHANCELLOR JALUKBARI GUWAHATI -781014. 5:THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF THE PRINCIPAL OF WEST GOALPARA COLLEGE BALARBHITA GOALPARA Page No.# 2/3 REPRESENTED BY THE MEMBER SECRETARY P.O.BALARBHITA DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783129 6:THE GOVERNING BODY OF WEST GOALPARA COLLEGE REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT P.O.BALARBHITA DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783129 7:DR. MANISHA BHATTACHARYYA D/O- MADAN CH. BHATTACHARYYA R/O- LARICA GREEN VALLEY NEAR DON BOSCO UNIVERSITY AZARA BLOCK NO-9 FLAT NO-405 P.O- AZARA DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781015 8:SHEIKH FARUK AHMED PRINCIPAL OF MANDIA ANCHALIK COLLEGE P.O- MANDIA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781308. 9:MOYNUL HOQUE THE PRINCIPAL P.B. ANCHALIK MAHAVIDYALAYA P.O- BARANGHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP(RURAL) ASSAM PIN- 781354 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J ABEDIN, MR. K I MAZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR P BHARDWAJ (r-5,6),MR. A BARKATAKI (r-7),MR. M K CHOUDHURY (r-7),SC, G U,SC, U G C Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 24.04.2026 Mr. K. I. Mazumder, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instruction, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission as made above by Mr. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant