Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1525 (GAU)

SMT. RANJITA RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/5158/2022 · 2026-03-23

Shamima Jahan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010153932022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5158/2022 SMT. RANJITA RAY W/O LT. BALEN CH. RAY, VILL.- KHAMARPARA PT- I, CHUKANI, P.O.- BOTGURI, P.S.- ABHAYAPURI, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BONGAIGAON DIST.- BONGAIGAON ASSAM- 783380. 4:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH AND FAMILYWELFARE DEPARTMENT ASSAM HENGRABARI GUWAHATI- 6. 5:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES BONGAIGAON ASSAM- 783380 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD S HOQUE, MR. F A FAROOQUE,MR. M DEKA Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S M T CHISTI, SC, ELEM. EDU, MR. D UPAMANYU, SC, HEALTH AND F W BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 24.03.2026 Heard Mr. S. Hoque, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Pegu, learned Counsel for respondent no.1, 2 and 3. Also heard Ms. B Bora, learned Counsel on behalf of Mr. D. Upamanyu. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant case was in respect of reimbursement of the medical bill in respect of the husband of the petitioner and that during the pendency of the instant petition, the medical bill has been reimbursed by the department concerned. As such he submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the matter is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant