Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1510 (GAU)

PREMADA DEVI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/7891/2022 · 2026-03-05

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010250622022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7891/2022 PREMADA DEVI W/O LT. UPENDRA NATH R/O VILL- BAMUNBARI P.O. SOLAGURI, P.S. JAMUGURIHAT DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM-784180 PROPRIETRESS OF- DIBANG BAR-CUM-RESTAURANT (IMFL ON SHOP) AT PAKBIL, P.O. AND MOUZA- BALIPARA, TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN NO. 784101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EXCISE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GHY-06 3:THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SONITPUR TEZPUR PIN- 784001 4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER (EXCISE) SONITPUR TEZPUR PIN- 784001 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE SONITPUR TEZPUR Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM PIN- 784001 6:THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE TEZPUR SADAR CIRCLE SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 78400 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR, S BARBHUYAN,MR. R BORA,MR. R DEKA,MR H BEZBARUA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EXCISE DEPTT., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 06-03-2026 Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of subsequent developments, the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition. Mr. N. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Excise Department for the State respondents is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant