Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1499 (GAU)

KAJALI BARO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/8282/2022 · 2026-02-15

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010249562022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8282/2022 KAJALI BARO S/O- LATE SOMIN CH. BARO, R/O- VILL.- ALIGURI, P.O. UTTARKUCHI, DIST. BAKSA (BTR), ASSAM, PIN- 781372. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ELEMENTARY, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (ESSTT-A) DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19. 4:THE SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BTC KOKRAJHAR. 5:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTC KOKRAJHAR. 6:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BAKSA MUSHALPUR Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 7:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BAKSA MUSHALPUR ASSAM 8:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS MUSHALPUR BAKSA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR C GOSWAMI, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, BTC,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 16.02.2026 Heard Mr. C Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. B Bhuyan, learned Sr. standing counsel, B.T.C appearing for the State respondents. 2. Mr. C Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that, in view of the contentions raised by the respondents, he would pray for withdrawal of the petition, with liberty to re-file the same, if so permissible. 3. Prayer accepted. 4. The present Writ Petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant