Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3209/2022 SMT. KAMALA DEVI AND 3 ORS. W/O- LT. BIJOY SHANKAR THAKUR IN-CHARGE HEADMASTER (EXPIRED ON 31.01.2022) SMTI. CHANDRA PRABHA PANDIT HINDI VIDYALAYA SONITPUR R/O- HOUSE NO. 313 WARD NO. 2 HINDU GAON RANGAPARA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. 2: AKASH KUMAR S/O LT. BIJOY SHANKAR THAKUR EXPIRED ON 31.01.2022 AND PETITIONER NO. 1 WHO WAS IN-CHARGE HEADMASTER SMTI. CHANDRA PRABHA PANDIT HINDI VIDYALAYA SONITPUR R/O- HOUSE NO. 313 WARD NO. 2 HINDU GAON RANGAPARA DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. 3: PRAKASH KUMAR S/O LT. BIJOY SHANKAR THAKUR EXPIRED ON 31.01.2022 AND PETITIONER NO. 1 WHO WAS IN-CHARGE HEADMASTER SMTI. CHANDRA PRABHA PANDIT HINDI VIDYALAYA SONITPUR Page No.# 2/3 R/O- HOUSE NO. 313 WARD NO. 2 HINDU GAON RANGAPARA DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. 4: BIKASH KUMAR S/O LT. BIJOY SHANKAR THAKUR EXPIRED ON 31.01.2022 AND PETITIONER NO. 1 WHO WAS IN-CHARGE HEADMASTER SMTI. CHANDRA PRABHA PANDIT HINDI VIDYALAYA SONITPUR R/O- HOUSE NO. 313 WARD NO. 2 HINDU GAON RANGAPARA DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-6. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM CUM CHAIRPERSON STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE KAHILIPARA GHY.-19. 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SONITPUR DISTRICT CIRCLE DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM. 4:THE I/C HEADMASTER SMTI. CHANDRA PRABHA PANDIT HINDI VIDYALAYA PO- THAKURBARI DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. ------------ Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for : MR. A K DUTTA Advocate for : SC SEC. EDU. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 29.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.M.T Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3. 2. Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have granted to the petitioner the reliefs as claimed for by the petitioner and accordingly, the present Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the above submissions made by Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed on being rendered infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant