IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 94 of 2022 -------- Madan Paswan ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. …… Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Kr.Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Deepankar, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Ranjan, Adv. -------- Order No. 08/ Dated: 19th August, 2026 This is a disposed of matter. This case has been listed today at the behest of the office. Office has pointed out in its office note dated 18th August, 2026 that trial court record has not been called for but in the judgment dated 13.08.2026, there is a direction to send back the trial court record. 2. This Court has perused the judgment dated 13th August, 2026 and found that in paragraph 18, it has wrongly been mentioned that trial court record be sent back. 3. Accordingly, the paragraph 18 in the judgment dated 13th August, 2026 stands corrected to the extent that it may be read as “let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned court immediately for information and needful”. 4. Except above correction in paragraph 18 of the said judgment, all other contents, findings, directions and the operative portion of the judgment dated 13th August, 2026 shall remain unchanged. 5. Let this order be communicated to the learned trial Court for information and needful. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 19.08.2026 Basant/