Page No.# 1/5 GAHC030005242022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/20/2022 Sh. C. Ralthanga and 52 others Chhungte Village Champhai District, Mizoram 2: Sh. Kamdeihpianga 3: Sh. Chhunliana 4: Sh. Malsawmhlua 5: Sh. Zakhuala 6: Sh. H. Hauliana 7: Sh. Rohmingthanga 8: Sh. Ralthantluanga 9: Sh. Lalmuanpuia 10: Sh. Ralkungi 11: Sh. H. Lalrinpuia 12: Sh. Darpuiliana Page No.# 2/5 13: Sh. Thawmvunga 14: Sh. R. Lalthangliana 15: Sh. Pumthanga 16: Sh. Lalthakima 17: Sh. H. Hmingdailova 18: Sh. Khualngaihthanga 19: Sh. T. Vanlalkunga 20: Sh. R. Vanlallawma 21: Sh. Thangchhunga 22: Smt. Ningsiantingi 23: Sh. Khenkapa 24: Sh. RT Thana 25: Sh. Khamzananga 26: Sh. Laikunga 27: Sh. V. Biakthanga 28: Sh. Lalhmingthanga Page No.# 3/5 29: Sh. L. Khuma Varte 30: Sh. F. Lalnunsiama 31: Sh. Samuel Muanpuia Ralte 32: Sh. F. Lalbiakmawia 33: Sh. Lalramthanga 34: Sh. Thangchunga 35: Sh. Ralkapthanga 36: Smt. Lalngaihzuali 37: Sh. Zatluanga 38: Sh. Lalpara 39: Sh. Hrangkhuma 40: Sh. C. Lalnghinglova 41: Sh. H. Sangzuala 42: Smt. Malsawmi 43: Sh. Bawichia 44: Sh. Bawlkunga Page No.# 4/5 45: Sh. C. Denga 46: Sh. Chalbawia 47: Sh. F.H. Lalsangliana 48: Sh. K. Zamlova 49: Sh. S. Doliana 50: Sh. S. Liansangvunga 51: Sh. Sangkhuma 52: Sh. S.T. Ropiang VERSUS Dr.Renu Sharma, IAS, the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 6 Ors. Aizawl2:Sh. R. Zarzosanga Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Department 3:Sh. B. Lalchhawntluanga Additional Deputy Commissioner Champhai 4:Sh. M.Misael MCS. 5:Sh Lalthansang Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Mrs. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte for R2, R4 & R7 Page No.# 5/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 02.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 7. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as the contemnors have complied with the order dated 17.03.2022 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 31/2022, as well as the order dated 01.06.2022 passed in Interlocutory Application No. 74/2022, the matter may be closed. 3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the fact that the contemnors have complied with the orders alleged to have been violated by them, this contempt petition is hereby closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant