IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65985 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2020 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== SUDHIR KUMAR S/o Late Ramanuj Singh R/o Village- Mahmudpur, Ranisarai, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shiv Dhari Yadav @ Shiv Dhari Prasad S/o Late Brij Yadav R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. 3. Satyendra Kumar S/o Shiv Dhari Yadav @ Shiv Dhari Prasad R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. 4. Kishori Yadav @ Kishori Singh @ Kishori S/o Late Brij Yadav R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. 5. Kamlesh Kumar S/o Kishori Yadav @ Kishori Singh @ Kishori R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. 6. Meetu Kumar @ Mitra Ranjan Kumar S/o Kishori Yadav @ Kishori Singh @ Kishori R/o Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17 20-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 6. 2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 6, who were enlarged on bail by order dated 23.03.2022 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 32436 of 2021 arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2020 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65985 of 2022(17) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Perused the records. Having considered the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner ought to have approached the same Bench, so long as it was available, for seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 or in the alternative, should have approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court. This Court cannot sit in appeal over or review the order passed by another learned Single Judge of this Court. 4. In view of the discussions made above, this application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T