IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.171 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16563 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Tripti Narayan Jha, S/o Late Bchcha Jha, Assistant Teacher in Ramanujiya Sanskrit Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Nabahi, P.S. - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. 2. Binod Kumar, S/o Late Siya Saran Thakur, Assistant Teacher in Ramanujiya Sanskrit Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Nabahi, P.S. - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. 3. Suresh Raut, S/o Late Ram Bilash Raut, Assistant Teacher in Ramanujiya Sanskrit Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Nabahi, P.S. - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Director of Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna presently in-charge of the post of Chairman of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 2. Manoj Kumar, S/o not known, Director of Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna presently in-charge of the post of Chairman of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 3. Rajesh Kumar, S/o not known, Presently working as Secretary of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 4. Ram Chandra Mandal, S/o not known, Presenting working as District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur, Advocate For the State : Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28 For the Board : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 05-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 08.02.2019 Patna High Court MJC No.171 of 2022(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 passed in CWJC No. 16563 of 2017.” 3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party and learned counsel has taken this Court to the memo no.1626 dated 28.06.2022 by which the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U