MUMTAZ MANZOOR v. COMMISSIONER AND ORS. (SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION)
WP(C)/267/2022 · 2026-09-14
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1108 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1108 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 13 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 267/2022 CM(725/2022) MUMTAZ MANZOOR …PETITIONER(S) Through: None. V/s.
COMMISSIONER AND ORS ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 14.09.2026
01. The record reveals that for the last two consecutive dates, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner and same is the position as on today. Seemingly, the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter, or the cause for which the petition was filed, may no longer survive.
02. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 14.09.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document