SNIGDHARANI SAMANTARAY @ MANGARAJ v. LAXMINARAYAN SAMANTARAY
GUAP/6/2022 · 2026-07-29
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1102 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1102 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
GUAP No.6 of 2022
Snigdharani Samantary @ Mangaraj …. Petitioner
None -versus- Laxminarayan Samantaray & ors. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 29.07.2026
02.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call.
3. It is revealed from the record that, when the matter was listed before the Lawzima Court on 23.06.2026,
learned Counsel for the Petitioner remained absent. However, three weeks’ time was granted to remove the defects, failing which it was ordered to place the matter before the Bench for passing appropriate order. Today also, when the matter is called, learned Counsel for the Petitioner remains absent on call. That apart, defects are yet to be removed.
4. Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution so also for non-removal of defects.
Mona
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE