HAJI BASHIR AHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/2150/2022 · 2026-09-09
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1100 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1100 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 58 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C)No. 2150/2022
Haji Bashir Ahmad Mir …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).
Through: None
Vs.
UT of JK and Ors. ...Respondent(s).
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 09.09.2026
01. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three consecutive dates of hearings and same is the position today as well. It seems that petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 09.09.2026
“Shamim Dar”